INSTANCES WHERE THE ENERGY LAW JOURNAL HAS BEEN CITED IN OPINIONS AND OTHER PUBLISHED LEGAL MATERIALS

 

COURTS

1.      Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility Control, 830 A.2d 1121 (Conn. 2003) (citing A. Gupta, Tracking Stranded Costs, 21 Energy L.J. 113 (2000)).

2.      Tennessee ex rel. City of Cookeville, Tenn. v. Upper Cumberland Elec. Membership Corp.,  256 F.Supp.2d 754  (M.D.Tenn., 2003) (citing The Rural Electrification Act Preempts State Condemnation Law:  City of Morgan City v. South Louisiana Electric Cooperative Ass'n, 16 Energy L.J. 489 (1995)).

3.      Idaho Power Co. v. FERC, 312 F.3d 454 (D.C.Cir. 2002) (citing Report of the Committee on Electric Utility Regulation, 18 Energy L.J. 197, 200 (1997); Andrew S. Katz, Using the EEI-NEM Master Contract to Manage Power Marketing Risks, 21 Energy L.J. 269 (2000)).

4.      Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility Control, 2002 WL 31000014 (Conn. Super. 2002) (citing A. Gupta, Tracking Stranded Costs, 21 Energy L.J. 113 (2000)).

5.      Chugach Electric Ass'n, Inc. v. Regulatory Com'n of Alaska, 49 P.3d 246 (Alaska 2002) (citing Harvey L. Reiter, Competition Between Public and Private Distributors In a Restructured Power Industry, 19 Energy L.J. 333 (1998)).

6.      Interstate Natural Gas Ass'n of America v. FERC,  285 F.3d 18  (D.C.Cir. 2002) (citing Paul Mohler, Experiments at the FERC--In Search of a Hypothesis, 19 Energy L.J. 281, 300 (1998)). 

7.      City of Boulder v. Colorado Pub. Utilities Com'n, 996 P.2d 1270 (Colo. 2000) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995)).

8.      Automated Power Exchange, Inc. v. FERC, 204 F.3d 1144 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling:  Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994)).

9.      Brazos Elec. Power Co-op., Inc. v. FERC, 205 F.3d 235 (5th Cir. 2000) (citing Richard Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995)).

10. Louisiana Energy and Power Authority v. FERC, 141 F.3d 364 (D.C.Cir. 1998) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Antitrust Policy in the New Electricity Industry, 17 Energy L.J. 29 (1996)).

11. Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 998 F.Supp. 946 (N.D.Ill.1998) (citing Stokes, The Limit of Government's Regulatory Authority Over Non-Adjacent Wetlands: Hoffman Homes, Inc. v. EPA, 15 Energy L.J. 137 (1994)).

12. K N Gas Supply Services, Inc. v.  American Production Partnership-V, Ltd., 994 F.Supp. 1283  (D.Colo. 1998) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr. Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)). 

13. U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. City of Longmont, 948 P.2d 509 (Colo. 1997) (citing Kiplyn R. Farmer, Note, FERC Waiver of the Filed Rate Doctrine:  Some Suggested Principles, 9 Energy L.J. 497 (1988)).

14. Sea Robin Pipeline Co. v. FERC, 127 F.3d 365 (5th Cir. 1997)  (citing Angela S. Chitwood-Beehler, A Conflict in the Circuits: The FERC's Jurisdiction Over Gathering Rates, 13 Energy L.J. 375 (1992)).

15. General Motors Corp. v. Tracy,  519 U.S. 278, 117 S.Ct. 811, 136 L.Ed.2d 761  (U.S.Ohio, 1997) (citing Mogel & Gregg, Appropriateness of Imposing Common Carrier Status on Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, 4 Energy L.J. 155 (1983)).  

16. In re Harper, 223 A.D.2d 200 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996).

a.      Note: this case deals with plagiarism by a law student using an ELJ article.

17. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Finkelstein, 933 S.W.2d 591 (Tex.App.-San Antonio, 1996) (citing Jerome C. Muys et al., Report of the Committee on Public Lands, 15 Energy L.J. 219 (1994)).

18. United Distribution Companies v. FERC, 88 F.3d 1105 (D.C.Cir. 1996) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)). 

19. Association of Oil Pipe Lines v. FERC, 83 F.3d 1424 (D.C.Cir. 1996) (citing Steven Reed & Pantelis Michalopoulos, Oil Pipeline Regulatory Reform:  Still in the Labyrinth?, 16 Energy L.J. 65 (1995)).

20. Alliance for Clean Coal v. Miller, 44 F.3d 591 (7th Cir.(Ill.) 1995) (citing G. William Stafford, Electric Wholesale Power Sales at Market-Based Rates, 12 Energy L.J. 291 (1991); Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is this Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994)).    

21. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. F.C.C., 988 F.2d 1254, (D.C.Cir. 1993) (citing W. Whittaker, The Discounted Cash Flow Methodology:  Its Use in Estimating a Utility's Cost of Equity, 12 Energy L.J. 265 (1991)).

22. Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Public Utility Com'n of Texas, 841 S.W.2d 459 (Tex.App.-Austin1992) (citing Clinton A. Vince & John S. Moot, Federal Preemption versus State Utility Regulation in a Post-Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1 (1989); Lindh, Federal Preemption of State Regulation in the Field of Electricity and Natural Gas:  A Supreme Court Chronicle, 10 Energy L.J. 277 (1989)).

23. AIU Ins. Co. v. Superintendent, 1991 Me. Super. Lexis 5 (Super. Ct. M.E. 1991)

a.      Note: only published in LexisNexis.

24. Williams Natural Gas Co. v. FERC, 943 F.2d 1320 (D.C.Cir. 1991)  (citing Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988);  Williams, The Proposed Sea-Change in Natural Gas Regulation, 6 Energy L.J. 233 (1985)).

25. National-Southwire Aluminum Co. v. Big Rivers Elec. Corp., 785 S.W.2d 503 (Ct. App. Ky. 1990)

26. City of Saint Paul v. Northern States Power Co., 462 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. 1990) (citing Pierce, Reconstructing the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).

27. In re Public Serv. Co. of N.H., 114 B.R. 820 (Bankr. D. N.H. 1990)

28. In re Public Serv. Co. of N.H., 108 B.R. 854 (Bankr. D. N.H. 1989)

29. Mobil Oil Exploration and Producing Southeast, Inc. v. FERC, 885 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1989) (citing Shoneman & McConnell, F.E.R.C. Order No. 451:  Freedom (Almost) for Old Gas, 7 Energy L.J. 299 (1986); Mogel & Gregg, Appropriateness of Imposing Common Carrier Status on Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, 4 Energy L.J. 155 (1983)). 

30. Mustang Energy Corp. v. FERC, 859 F.2d 1447 (10th Cir. 1988) (citing Griggs, Restructuring the Natural Gas Industry:  Order No. 436 and Other Regulatory Initiatives, 7 Energy L.J. 71 (1986)).

31. Kansas Power and Light Co. v. FERC, 851 F.2d 1479 (D.C.Cir. 1988) Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry From Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).

32. Kentucky West Virginia Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Com'n, 837 F.2d 600 (3rd Cir.(Pa.) 1988) (citing Hobelman, The Narragansett Decision and Its Aftermath, 6 Energy L.J. 33 (1985)).

33. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. FERC, 823 F.2d 630 (D.C.Cir. 1987) (citing Griggs, Restructuring the Natural Gas Industry:  Order No. 436 and Other Regulatory Initiatives, 7 Energy L.J. 71 (1986)).

34. Isla Petroleum Corp. v. Department of Consumer Affairs, 640 F.Supp. 474 (D.Puerto Rico 1986) (citing E. O'Donnell & L. Glassman, Energy Emergencies:  Constitutional Constraints on State Efforts to Control Oil Supplies and Prices, 5 Energy L.J. 77 (1984)).

35. Maryland People's Counsel v. FERC, 761 F.2d 780 (D.C.Cir., 1985) (citing Means & Angyal, The Regulation and Future Role of Direct Producer Sales, 5 Energy L.J. 1 (1984)).

36. Farmers Union Cent. Exchange, Inc. v. FERC, 734 F.2d 1486 (D.C.Cir. 1984) (citing Report of the Committee on Oil Pipeline Regulation, 4 Energy L.J. 143 (1983); Navarro & Stauffer, The Legal History and Economic Implications of Oil Pipeline Regulation, 2 Energy L.J. 291 (1981); Coburn, The Case for Petroleum Pipeline Deregulation, 3 Energy L.J. 225 (1982)).

 

LAW REVIEWS & JOURNALS

 

1.         M. Elizabeth Magill, Agency Choice of Policy Making Form, 71 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1383 (2004) (citing Nicholas W. Fells, Beyond the Stopwatch: Determining Appellate Venue on Review of FERC Orders, 1 Energy L.J. 35, 45 (1980)).

2.         Elizabeth M. Youngdale, Reviewing the Law Reviews, 71 Def. Couns. J. 429 (2004) (citing Nicholas W. Fells, Beyond the Stopwatch: Determining Appellate Venue on Review of FERC Orders, 25 Energy L.J. 1 (2004)).

3.         Stacy Rentner, Note, Venezuela: How a Hydrocarbons Law Crippled an Oil Giant, 27 Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 351 (2004) (citing Jay G. Martin, Venezuela as an Opportunity for Investment in the Petroleum Industry, 20 Energy L.J. 325, 328 (1999)).

4.         Darci Deltorto, Note, Pole Position: National Cable & Telecommunications Ass’n v. Gulf Power Co. and the Implications of the FCC’s Pole Attachments Act Reaching Higher Ground … & Elizabeth B. Dickerson, Note, Effect of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 on Access to Electric and Gas Utilities Rights-of-Way, 22 Energy L.J. 361, 362 (2001).

5.         James M. Van Nostrand, The Standard for Setting Utility Rates in Wyoming: Restoring the Required Balance Between Investors and Customers, 4 Wyo. L. Rev. 245 (2004) (citing Sean B. Cunningham, The Requirements of the “Just and Reasonable” Standard: Legal Bases for Reform of Electric Transmission Rates, 21 Energy L.J. 389, 396 (2000) (citing Frank P. Darr, The Constitutional Limits on Ratemaking: A Response to William Pond, 11 Energy L.J. 53, 63 (1990)).

6.         Matthew Kellar, Note, “Damn the Torpedoes! Full Speed Ahead”: The FCC’s Decision to Deregulate Media Ownership and the Threat to Viewpoint Diversity, 12 J.L. & Pol’y 891 (2004) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC’s Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)). 

7.         Maria Angelica, Note, The Colombian Royalty System: How Flexibility in Law-Making Generates Investment, 9 L. & B. Rev. Am. 189 (2003) (citing Jay G. Martin, Venezuela as an Opportunity for Investment in the Petroleum Industry, 20 Energy L.J. 325 (1999) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191, 196 (1996)).

8.         Robert Ressetar, The Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository From a Federalism Perspective, 23 J. Land Resources & Envtl. L. 219 (2003) (citing Scott R. Helton, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 Energy L.J. 179, 185 (2002)).

9.         Judy Sheldrew, Note, Shutting The Barn Door Before The Horse Is Stolen: How And Why State Public Utility Commissions Should Regulate Transactions Between A Public Utility And Its Affiliates, 4 Nev. L.J. 164  (2003) (citing Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935: The "Old" Federalism and State Regulation of Inter-State Holding Companies, 17 Energy L.J. 343, 343 (1996)). 

10.      Jim Chen, The Price Of Macroeconomic Imprecision: How Should The Law Measure Inflation? 54 Hastings L.J. 1375 (2003) (citing Steven Reed & Pantelis Michalopoulos, Oil Pipeline Regulatory Reform: Still in the Labyrinth?, 16 Energy L.J. 65 (1995); Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).

11.      Daniel F. Spulber & Christopher S. Yoo, Access To Networks: Economic And Constitutional Connections, 88 Cornell L. Rev. 885 (2003) (citing William J. Baumol & J. Gregory Sidak, The Pig in the Python: Is Lumpy Capacity Investment Used and Useful?, 23 Energy L.J. 383 (2002); Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and "Takings", 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989)).

12.      Mark Detsky, Notes & Comments, The Global Light: An Analysis Of International And Local Developments In The Solar Electric Industry And Their Lessons For United States Energy Policy, 14 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y 301 (2003) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995)).

13.      Ashutosh Bhagwat, Institutions And Long Term Planning: Lessons From The California Electricity Crisis, 55 Admin. L. Rev. 95 (2003) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the "Perfect Storm", 22 ENERGY L.J. 65 (2001)). 

14.      Edward A. Fitzgerald, Solid Waste Agency Of Northern Cook County V. U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers: Isolated Waters, Migratory Birds, Statutory And Constitutional Interpretation, 43 Nat. Resources J. 11 (2003) (citing Stephen Jay Stokes, The Limit of Government's Regulatory Authority over Non-Adjacent Wetlands: Hoffman Homes, Inc. v. EPA, 15 Energy L.J. 137 (1994)).

15.      Sarah G. Lopez, Note, Evaluation Of The Aol Time Warner Consent Decree's Ability To Prevent Antitrust Harm In The Cable Broadband Isp Market, 17 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 127 (2003) (citing Submitted Committee Reports: Report of the Antitrust Committee, 22 Energy L.J. 143 (2001)).

16.      Robert Ressetar, The Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository From A Federalism Perspective, 23 J. Land Resources & Envtl. L. 219, (2003) (citing Scott R. Helton, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 Energy L.J. 179 (2002)).

17.      18 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 1021 (2003) Bibliography Issue Article Entries Alphbetized By Author Last Name  (citing Scott R. Helton, Comment, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 Energy L.J. 179 (2002)).

18.      Alexandra I. Metzner, Comment, Were California's Electricity Price Shocks Nothing More Than A New Form Of Stranded Costs?, 52 Am. U. L. Rev. 535 (2002) (citing Ajay Gupta, Tracking Stranded Costs, 21 Energy L.J. 113 (2000); James J. Hoecker, "Used and Useful": Autopsy of a Ratemaking Policy, 8 Energy L.J. 303 (1987); Walter R. Hall, II, Securitization and Stranded Cost Recovery, 18 Energy L.J. 363 (1997)).

19.      A Roundtable Discussion on Volunteerism, 40 Houston Law. 10, Nov.-Dec. 2002.

20.      Elizabeth M. Youngdale, Reviewing the Law Reviews, 69 Def. Couns. J. 539 (2002).

21.      Kim Diana Connolly, Has the Field Grown Too Complex for a State-Specific “Handbook” on Environmental Law?, 9 S.C. Envtl. L.J. 279 (2002) (book review).

22.      Katharine Braid, State and Provincial Regulation of Natural Resource Exploitation, 28 Can.-U.S. L.J. 337 (2002). 

a.      Note: Author is introducing William Mogel for a conference. 

23.      Einer Elhauge, Preference-Estimating Statutory Default Rules, 102 Colum. L. Rev. 2027 (2002) (Citing Jerome Nelson, The Chevron Deference Rule and Judicial Review of FERC Orders, 9 Energy L.J. 59 (1988)).

24.      Practising Law Institute PLI Order No. B0-01JN  November, 2002    Utility Restructuring 2002: Negotiating, Structuring & Documenting the Deal   Drawing Back The Regulatory Curtain: Antitrust Issues And Hypothetical Problems    Ray S. Bolze  part of Public Utility Law (1992-2002). He co-authored Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus for a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000). He participated in a mock courtroom trial at the August 1998 ABA Annual Meeting in Toronto entitled, "Antitrust ...” (Jan. 10, 1996).   [Fn 7]. See Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113, 113-14, 119-21 (1997). See also Legislative and Oversight Hearing on Antitrust Aspects of Electricity Deregulation Before the House Comm.  John C. Peirce & Linda L. Walsh, Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus For a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000).   [Fn 24]. See, e.g., United States v. Topco Associates, Inc., 405 U.S. 596 (1972).

25.      Aletheia Gooden, The 10,000 Year Guarantee: High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal At Yucca Mountain, Nevada,  26-FALL Environs Envtl. L. & Pol'y J. (2002) (citing Scott R. Helton, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 ENERGY L.J. 179 (2002)).

26.      Mozelle Thompson, 16 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 609 (2002) Symposium Online Activities & Their Impact on the Legal Profession   Keynote Address: The Federal Trade Commission And Regulating E- Commerce. (citing Report of the Antitrust Committee, 22 Energy L.J. 143, 158  (2001)).

27.      Barry J. Goehler, Control Of Mercury Emissions From Coal-Fired Electric Power Plants, 9 Envtl. Law. 119 (2002); Christie Ingram, Note, Dayton Power v. Browner, 21 Energy L.J. 159 (2000)).

28.      Laura Duos, Comment, Order 888: Has The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Invaded The States' Jurisdictional Territory? 54 Admin. L. Rev. 1213 (2002) (citing Curt L. Hebert, Jr., The Buest for an Inventive Utility Regulatory Agenda, 19 ENERGY L.J. 1 (1998); Robert J. Michaels, The Governance of Transmission Operators, 20 ENERGY L.J. 233 (1999); William H. Penniman & Paul B. Turner, A Jurisdictional Clash Over Electricity Transmission: Northern States Power v. FERC, 20 ENERGY L.J. 205 (1999)).

29.      Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, Full Circle In The Formerly Regulated Industries?, 33 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 767 (2002) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113, 120 (1997); Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994).

30.      James J. White & David A. Peters, Essay, A Footnote For Jack Dawson, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 1954  (2002) (citing J. David Hughes, Indefinite Escalators: 1985 Does FERC Have a 'Stairway' Down?, 4 Energy L.J. 189 (1983); Stimpert, Note, Lenape Resources Corporation v.  Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company: Natural Gas Take-Or-Pay Contracts Under The Uniform Commercial Code, 18 Energy L.J. 421 (1997)).

31.      Courtney Shaw, Note, Uncertain Justice: Liability Of Multinationals Under The Alien Tort Claims Act, 54 Stan. L. Rev. 1359 (2002) (citing Eric Marcks, Avoiding Liability for Human Rights Violations in Project Finance, 22 Energy L.J. 301 (2001)).

32.      Jim Rossi, The Electric Deregulation Fiasco: Looking To Regulatory Federalism To Promote A Balance Between Markets And The Provision Of Public Goods, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 1768 (2002) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the "Perfect Storm," 22 Energy L.J. 65, 71 (2001); Nicholas W. Fels & Frank R. Lindh, Lessons from the California "Apocalypse:" Jurisdiction Over Electric Utilities, 22 Energy L.J. 1 (2001)).

33.      Joseph P. Tomain, The Past And Future Of Electricity Regulation, 32 Envtl. L. 435 (2002) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the  "Perfect Storm", 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001); Nicholas W. Fels & Frank R. Lindth, Lessons from the California "Apocalypse": Jurisdiction Over Electric Utilities, 22 Energy L.J. 1 (2001); Jim Rossi, Universal Service in Competitive Retail Electric Power Markets: Whither the Duty to Serve?, 21 Energy L.J. 27, 27 (2000)).

34.      Hoang Dang, New Power, Few New Lines: A Need For A Federal Solution, 17 J. Land Use & Envtl. L. 327 (2002) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994)).

35.      Kincaid C. Brown, How Many Copies Are Enough? Using Citation Studies To Limit Journal Holdings, 94 Law Libr. J. 301 (2002) citing 25  Energy L.J.

36.      Stuart M. Reynolds, Jr., The Relationship Of Antitrust Laws To Regulated Industries And Intellectual Property In The New Marketplace, 4 Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 1  (2002) (citing Ray S. Bolze et al., Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus for a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000)). 

37.      Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, Electric Deregulation After California: Down But Not Out 54 Admin. L. Rev. 333 (2002) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 ENERGY L.J. 351 (1994)).

38.      John A. Wetenkamp, 33 McGeorge L. Rev. 414 (2002) Review of Selected 2001 California Legislation  Chapter 12: Expedited Power Plant Siting As Response To Power Crisis (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the "Perfect Storm," 22 ENERGY L.J. 65 (2001)).

39.      Joshua Z. Rokach, 16-WTR Nat. Resources & Env't 183 (2002), The Invisible Hand Will Secure The Electric Grid  (citing Hon. Curt L. Hébert, Jr., Buest for an Inventive Utility Regulatory Agenda, 19 ENERGY L.J.. 1 (1998)).

40.      Margaret A. Johnston, Environmental Law--Clean Water Act--The Supreme Court Scales Back The Army Corps Of Engineers' Jurisdiction Over "Navigable Waters" Under The Clean Water Act. Solid Waste Agency V. United States Army Corps Of Engineers, 24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 329 (2002) (citing Stephen Jay Stokes, Note, The Limit of Government's Regulatory Authority over Non-Adjacent Wetlands: Hoffman Homes, Inc. v. EPA, 15 Energy L.J. 137 (1994)). 

41.      Symposium, A Rational Foreign Policy Toward Haiti And How The Media Shapes Public Perception Of Haiti, 56 U. Miami L. Rev. 405 (2002) (citing The Rural Electrification Act Preempts State Condemnation Law: City of Morgan City v. South Louisiana Electric Cooperative Association, 16 Energy L.J. 489 (1995)).

42.      Paul A. Kemnitzer, Note, The Anti-Competitive Effects Of Stranded Costs On The Creation Of Municipal Electric Companies,  45 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 701 (2002) (citing Harvey L. Reiter, Competition Between Public And Private Distributors In A Restructured Power Industry, 19 Energy L.J. 333 (1998)).

43.      Thomas W. Merrill, Colloquium, Incomplete Compensation For Takings 11 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 110 (2002) (citing Thomas R. Stauffer, Valuation of Assets in International Takings, 17 Energy L.J. 459, 461 (1996)).

44.      Ray S. Bolze,  Practising Law Institute  PLI Order No. B0-013V  October 22-23, 2001, Utility Restructuring Drawing Back The Regulatory Curtain: Antitrust Issues And Hypothetical Problems (citing Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus for a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000); Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997); Ray S. Bolze, John C. Peirce & Linda L. Walsh, Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus For a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000)).

45.      Cristian Defrancia, Note, Local Competition And Telecommunications Convergence: Gauging The Need For New Legislation, 17 J.L. & Pol. 739 (2001) (citing Vicky A. Bailey, Reassessing the Role of Regulators of Competitive Energy Markets, or: Walking the Walk of Competition, 20 Energy L.J. 5 (1999)).  

46.      John Burritt Mcarthur, The Mutual Benefit Implied Covenant For Oil And Gas Royalty Owners, 41 Nat. Resources J. 795 (2001) (citing John Burritt McArthur, Antitrust in the [De]Regulated Natural Gas Industry, 18 Energy L.J. 1 (1997)). 

47.      York Schnorbus, Tracking Stock In Germany: Is German Corporate Law Flexible Enough To Adopt American Financial Innovations?, 22 U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L. 541  (2001) (citing Ajay Gupta, Tracking Stranded Costs, 21 Energy L.J. 113 (2000)).

48.      Frank R. Lindh, Keeping California's Pilot Lights Burning: A Rare Exercise Of Presidential Powers, 16-SUM Nat. Resources & Env't 320 (2001) (citing as Fels and Lindh, Lessons from the California "Apocalypse": Jurisdiction Over Electric Utilities, 22 ENERGY L.J. 1 (2001)).   

49.      Michael A. Mullett, Symposium, Financing For Eternity The Storage Of Spent Nuclear Fuel: A Crisis Of Law And Policy Precipitated By Electric Deregulation Will Face New President, 18 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 383 (2001) (citing Michael A. Bauser, Comment, Recent Decisions Concerning the DOE's Commercial Radioactive Waste Disposal Program, 19 Energy L.J. 387 (1998)).

50.      Alfred C. Aman Jr., Symposium, Privatization And The Democracy Problem In Globalization: Making Markets More Accountable Through Administrative Law, 28 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1477  (2001) (citing John Burrit McArthur, Antitrust in the New Deregulated Natural Gas Industry, 18 Energy L.J. 1 (1997)).

51.      R.S. Radford, J. David Breemer,  The Significance And Proper Role Of Investment-Backed Expectations In Regulatory Takings Law American Law Institute - American Bar Association Continuing Legal Education  May 3, 2001    Inverse Condemnation and Related Government Liability          Law and Regulation, SE88 (May-June, 2000). (citing Paul Turner & Sam Kalen, Takings and Beyond: Implications for Regulation, 19 Energy L.J. 25 (1998)).

52.      Laura D. Windsor, Amoco Production Company V. Southern Ute Indian Tribe: A Final Resolution To The Battle Over Ownership Of Coalbed Methane Gas?, 17 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 893 (2001) (citing Stacy L. Leeds, Note, Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Company: Judicial Construction of Coalbed Methane Gas Ownership, 17 Energy L.J. 489 (1996)).  

53.      Jason B. Myers, Symposium, The Sale Of Electricity In A Deregulated Industry: Should Article 2 Of The Uniform Commercial Code Govern?, 54 SMU L. Rev. 1051 (2001) (citing Mark E. Haedicke, Competitive-Based Contracts for the New Power Business, 17 Energy L.J. 103 (1996)).

54.      John A. Poakeart, Note and Comment, Watt's Going On?: Illuminating New York's Electric Generation Siting Process, 19 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 135 (2001)        (citing Roger Ridlehoover, The Role of Entry in Deregulating Gas and Electricity, 19 Energy L.J. 307 (1998); Robert L. Bradley, Jr., The Origins of Political Electricity: Market failure or Political Opportunism?, 17 Energy L.J. 59 (1996);    Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347, 351 (1995)).

55.      Jennifer Yelin-Kefer, Note, Warming Up To An International Greenhouse Gas Market: Lessons From The U.S. Acid Rain Experience 20 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 221 (2001) (citing Robert R. Nordhaus, Acid Rain Compliance: Coordination of State and Federal Regulation, 13 Energy L.J. 341(1992).

56.      Ewell E. Murphy, Jr., The Prospect For Further Energy Privatization In Mexico,  36 Tex. Int'l L.J. 75 (2001) (citing Emilio Carrillo Gamboa, Proposed Changes for the Mexican Electric Industry, 20 Energy L.J. 281 (1999)).

57.      J. Owen Saunders, North American Deregulation Of Electricity: Sharing Regulatory Sovereignty, 36 Tex. Int'l L.J. 167 (2001) (citing Shelly P. Battram & Reinier H. Lock, The Canada/United States Free-Trade Agreement and Trade in Energy, 9 Energy L.J. 327(1988)).

58.      William A. Borders, Note, Learning From The Storm: Lessons For Illinois Following California's Experience With Electricity Restructuring, 77 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 333 (2001) (citing Jim Rossi, Universal Service in Competitive Electric Retail Power Markets: Whither the Duty to Serve?, 21 Energy L.J. 27 (2000).

59.      Cassandra Burke Robertson, Bringing The Camel Into The Tent: State And Federal Power Over Electricity Transmission, 49 Clev. St. L. Rev. 71 (2001) (citing William H. Penniman & Paul B. Turner, A Jurisdictional Clash Over Electricity Transmission: Northern States Power v. FERC, 20 ENERGY L.J. 205, 216 (1999)). 

60.      Todd A. Snitchler, Maintaining The Status Buo: Electricity Utility Deregulation Difficulties In Ohio,  49 Clev. St. L. Rev. 647 (2001) (citing Walter R. Hall, II, Securitization and Stranded Cost Recovery, 18 ENERGY L.J. 363 (1998); Jim Rossi, Universal Service in Competitive Retail Electric Power Markets: Whither the Duty to Serve?, 21 ENERGY L.J. 27 (2000); Robert J. Michaels, The Governance of Transmission Operators, 20 ENERGY L.J. 233 (1999)).

61.      Ora R. Sheinson, Note, Lessons From The Jewish Law Of Property Rights For The Modern American Takings Debate, 26 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 483 (2001) (citing Paul Turner and Sam Kalen, Takings and Beyond: Implications for Regulation, 19 Energy L.J. 25 (1998)).

62.      Sandra DiFranco, Note, Denying Medical Staff Privileges Based On Economic Credentials, 15 J.L. & Health 247 (2000-2001) (citing William B. Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 ENERGY L.J. 337 (1987)).  

63.      Richard D. Cudahy, Whither Deregulation: A Look At The Portents, 58 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 155  (2001) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)).

64.      R. S. Radford & J. David Breemer, Great Expectations: Will Palazzolo V. Rhode Island Clarify The Murky Doctrine Of Investment-Backed Expectations In Regulatory Takings Law?, 9 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 449 (2001) (citing Paul Turner & Sam Kalen, Takings and Beyond: Implications for Regulation, 19 Energy L.J. 25 (1998)).

65.      Kurt Stephenson, Symposium, Taking Nature Into Account: Observations About The Changing Role Of Analysis And Negotiation In Hydropower Re-Licensing, 25 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 473 (2000) (citing Melissa Powell, A Case Study for Stakeholders: An Alternative to Traditional Hydroelectric Relicensing, 18 ENERGY L.J. 405 (1997); Michael A. Swiger et al., Paying for the Change: Can the FERC Force Dam Decommissioning at Relicensing?, 17 ENERGY L.J. 164 (1996)).  

66.      Michael Kantro, Symposium, Shall It Be Said That My Dusk Was In Truth My Dawn? [Fna1] What States Can Gleam From The Environmental Consebuences Of Deregulating Electricity In California,  25 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 533 (2000) (citing Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 ENERGY L.J. 347 (1995)).

67.      Moving The Climate Change Debate From Models To Proposed Legislation: Lessons From State Experience, Environmental Law Reporter  Article  November, 200030 ELR 10933 (citing Ajay Gupta, Tracking Stranded Costs, 21 Energy L.J. 113, 114 (2000)).

68.      Lawrence Flint, Comment, Shaping Nuclear Waste Policy At The Juncture Of Federal And State Law, 28 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 163 (2000) (citing Michael A. Bauser, Recent Decisions Concerning DOE's Commercial Radioactive Waste Disposal Program, 19 ENERGY L.J. 387 (1998)).

69.      Claire A. Watkins, Comment, Nuclear Power Rate Regulation After Eastern Enterprises: Are Ratepayers Being Taken For A Ride,? 28 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 191 (2000) (citing Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and Takings, 10 ENERGY L.J. 241, 241 (1989)).

70.      Warren H. Johnson, Note, Limited Liability Companies (Llc): Is The Llc Liability Shield Holding Up Under Judicial Scrutiny?, 35 New Eng. L. Rev. 177 (2000) (citing Martin G. Malsch, The  Purchase of U.S. Nuclear Power Plants by Foreign Entities, 20 ENERGY L.J. 263 (1999)).

71.      William C. Smith, Save Domestic Oil, Inc.'S Crude Oil Market Dumping Petition: Domestic And International Political Considerations, 8 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 147 (2000) (citing Jay G. Martin, Venezuela as an Opportunity for Investment in the Petroleum Industry, 20 Energy L.J. 325 (1999)).

72.      Jim Chen, Standing In The Shadows Of Giants: The Role Of Intergenerational Ebuity In Telecommunications Reform, 71 U. Colo. L. Rev. 921 (2000) (citing Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and "Takings" , 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989); Clinton A. Vince & John S. Moot, Federal Preemption Versus State Utility Regulation in a Post- Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1 (1989); Clifford S. Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 15 Energy L.J. 273 (1994)).

73.      Joseph D. Kearney, Will The Fcc Go The Way Of The Icc?, 71 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1153 (2000) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)).

74.      Susan Rose-Ackerman & Jim Rossi, Disentangling Deregulatory Takings, 86 Va. L. Rev. 1435 (2000) (citing Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and "Takings," 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989)).  

75.      Ray S. Bolze, Utility Restructuring Against The Backdrop Of Regulation: Antitrust Issues And Hypothetical Problems,  Practising Law Institute  PLI Order No. B0-00I5  October 2000 (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997); John C. Peirce & Linda F. Walsh, Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus For a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000)).

76.      John B. Gaffneyk, Note, What Blight Through Yonder Window Breaks?: A Survey Of The Environmental Implications Of Electric Utility Deregulation In Connecticut, 32 Conn. L. Rev. 1443 (2000) (citing Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 ENERGY L.J. 347, 350 (1995)).

77.      Nan Zhang, Note, Moving Towards A Competitive Electricity Market? The Dilemma Of Project  Finance In The Wake Of The Asian Financial Crisis, 9 Minn. J. Global Trade 715 (2000) (citing Mark E. Haedicke, Competitive-Based Contracts for the New Power Business, 17 Energy L.J. 103 (1996); Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347, 381 (1995); Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)). 

78.      Joseph P. Tomain, American Regulatory Policy: Have We Found The "Third Way"?,  48 U. Kan. L. Rev. 829 (2000) (citing Roger Ridlehoover, The Role of Entry in Deregulating Gas and Electricity, 19 Energy L.J. 307 (1998)).

79.      Ricky Pearce, Comment, A Call for a New Policy Toward CERCLA Cleanup Costs in the Eighth Circuit: Is it Fair to Punish the PRP Who Initiates the Cleanup at a Superfund Site?, 7 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 126 (2000).

a.      Note: Cited ELJ for authors credentials – Ricky Pearce, TU JD 2000, Executive Articles Editor for ELJ.

80.      Charles H. Koch, Control And Governance Of Transmission Organizations In The Restructured Electricity Industry, Jr.27 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 569  (2000) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Antitrust Policy in the New Electricity Industry, 17 ENERGY L.J. 29 (1996); James Barker et al., Regulation of Power Pools and System Operators: An International Comparison, 18 ENERGY L.J. 261 (1997); Robert J. Michaels, The Governance of Transmission Operators, 20 ENERGY L.J. 233 (1999)).

81.      Lois R. Lupica, Transition Losses In The Electric Power Market: A Challenge To The Premises Underlying The Arguments For Compensation, 52 Rutgers L. Rev. 649 (2000) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 ENERGY L.J. 323 (1994); Clifford S. Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 15 ENERGY L.J. 273, (1994); Walter R. Hall II, Securitization and Stranded Cost Recovery, 18 ENERGY L.J. 363 (1997)).

82.      Robert F. Blomquist, Some (Mostly) Theoretical And (Very Brief) Pragmatic Observations On Environmental Alternative Dispute Resolution In America, 34 Val. U. L. Rev. 343 (2000) (citing Melissa Powell, Note, A Case Study for Stakeholders: An Alternative to Traditional Hydroelectric Relicensing, 18 Energy L.J. 405 (1997)).

83.      Laura R. Starling, Comment, Don't Be Shocked!  Electric Utility Deregulation Can Benefit Low-Cost States  74 Tul. L. Rev. 1519 (2000) (citing Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995); Clifford S. Sikora, Open  Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 15 Energy L.J. 273(1994)). 

84.      Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The Inherent Limits On Judicial Control Of Agency Discretion: The D.C. Circuit And The Nondelegation Doctrine, 52 Admin. L. Rev. 63 (2000 (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J., 11 (1988)).

85.      Randall S. Guttery, Federal Wetlands Regulation: Restrictions On The Nationwide Permit Program And The Implications For Residential Property Owners, 37 Am. Bus. L.J. 299 (2000) (citing Stephen J. Stokes, Note, The Limit of Government's  Regulatory Authority over Non-Adjacent Wetlands: Hoffman Homes, Inc. v. EPA, 15 Energy L.J. 137 (1994).

86.      Anita Starchman Bryant, Amoco Production Co. V. Southern Ute Indian Tribe, 27 Ecology L.B. 799 (2000) (citing Stacy L. Leeds, Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Company: Judicial Construction of Coalbed Methane Gas Ownership, 17 Energy L.J. 489 (1996)).

87.      Prof. Dr. Günter Knieps, Sumposium, Interconnection And Network Access, 23 Fordham Int'l L.J. 90 (2000) (citing William B. Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).

88.      Gregory M. Stein, Who Gets The Takings Claim? Changes In Land Use Law, Pre-Enactment Owners, And Post-Enactment Buyers, 61 Ohio St. L.J. 89 (2000) (citing Paul Turner & Sam Kalen, Takings and Beyond: Implications for Regulation, 19 Energy L.J. 25 (1998)).

89.      William L. Church, The Eastern Enterprises Case: New Vigor For Judicial Review?,  2000 Wis. L. Rev. 547 (2000) (citing Staci L. Smith, Note, Nontraditional Takings and the Coal Act, 20 Energy L.J. 117 (1999)).

90.      Inara K. Scott, Note, A Model For Alaska: Deregulation In The Far North,  16 Alaska L. Rev. 329 (1999) (citing Stephen Angle & George Cannon, Jr., Independent Transmission Companies: The For-Profit Alternative in Competitive Electric Markets, 19 Energy L.J. 229 (1998)).

91.      Roger D. Blair, Reexamining The Role Of Illinois Brick In Modern Antitrust Standing Analysis, 68 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1 (1999) (citing Robert Elkin & Robert J. Bluhm, Indirect Purchaser Standing in Antitrust Actions: Duplicative Liability in the Energy Industry, 11 Energy L.J. 185 (1990)).

92.      Bentzion S. Turin, Comment, Eastern Philosophy: A Constitutional Argument For Full Stranded Cost Recovery By Deregulated Electric Utilities, 36 Hous. L. Rev. 1411 (1999) (citing Walter R. Hall II, Securitization and Stranded Cost Recovery, 18 Energy L.J. 363 (1997)).

93.      Christine A. Klein, On Dams And Democracy, 78 Or. L. Rev. 641 (1999) (citing Richard L. Gordon, Prisoners of Myth: The Leadership of the Tennessee Valley Authority, 1933-1990, 16 Energy L.J. 138 (1995); John D. Echeverria, The Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986, 8 Energy L.J. 61 (1987)).

94.      Ray S. Bolze & Deborah A. Carpentier, Utility Restructuring Against The Backdrop Of Regulation: Antitrust Issues,  Practicing Law Institute  PLI Order No. B0-00BX  October, 1999    Utility Restructuring: Negotiating, Structuring and Documenting the Deal 1999          (Jan. 10,  1996) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)).

95.      Joshua Z. Rokach, Structuring Against The Backdrop Of Deregulation: The Federal Power Ac,t Practicing Law Institute  PLI Order No. B0-00BX  October, 1999   (citing C.L. Hébert, Jr. The Buest for an Inventive Utility Agenda, 19 Energy L.J. 1, 13-19 (1998)).

96.      Jeffery  D. Schwartz, The Use Of The Antitrust State Action Doctrine In The Deregulated Electric Utility Industry, 48 Am. U. L. Rev. 1449, (1999) (citing   Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Antitrust Policy in the New Electric Industry, 17 Energy L.J. 29, 29 (1996); Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995)).

97.      Jim Chen, Commentary, The Second Coming Of Smyth V. Ames, 77 Tex. L. Rev. 1535 (1999) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1, 10  (1988); Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994); S. Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 15 Energy L.J. 273 (1994)).

98.      Symposium, An Empirical Evaluation of Specialized Law Reviews, 26 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 813 (1999). 

99.      Symposium, In Defense of Author Prominence: A Reply to Crespi and Korobkin, 26 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 877, (1999). 

100.  Deanell Reece Tacha, The Federal Courts In The 21st Century, 2 Chap. L. Rev. 7  (1999) (citing J. Michaels & Arthur S. DeVany, Market-Based Rates for Interstate Gas Pipelines: The Relevant Market and the Real Market, 16 Energy L.J. 299 (1995)).

101.  Michelle Kelban, Energy Law, 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 927 (1999) (citing Daniel F. Spulber, Pricing and the Incentive to Invest in Pipelines After Great Lakes, 15 Energy L.J. 377 (1994)). 

102.  Kerri M. Millikan, Energy Law, 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 937 (1999) (citing   Report of the Judicial Review Committee, 19 Energy L.J. 207 (1998)).  

103.  Jeff Mosteller, Comment, The Current And Future Climate Of Airline Consolidation: The Possible Impact Of An Alliance Of Two Large Airlines And An Examination Of The Proposed American Airlines-British Airways Alliance, 64 J. Air L. & Com. 575 (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)).

104.  Ann Brewster Weeks, Symposium, Advising Nature: Can We Get Clean Air From The Old Dirties?,  33 New Eng. L. Rev. 707 (1999) (citing Douglas O. Waikart, Report of the Committee on the Environment, 19 Energy L.J. 181 (1998)).

105.  Charles R. Sensiba, Comment, Who's In Charge Here?  The Shrinking Role Of The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission In Hydropower Relicensing, 70 U. Colo. L. Rev. 603 (1999) (citing Michael A. Swiger et al., Paying for the Change: Can the FERC Force Dam Decommissioning at Relicensing?, 17 Energy L.J. 163 (1996); Melissa Powell, Note, A Case Study for Stakeholders: An Alternative to Traditional Hydroelectric Relicensing, 18 Energy L.J. 405 (1997)).

106.  Mark H. Berman, The Intersection Of Energy Law And Bankruptcy Law: Who Has The Stop Sign, ?8 J. Bankr. L. & Prac. 119  (1999) (citing Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995)). 

107.  Joseph E. Buandt & Julie A. Harrison, Resources On Oil And Gas Law, 78 Mich. B.J. 232 (1999) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).  

108.  Mary Katherine Strahan, Connecting Currents: Toward The Integration Of North American Electricity Markets, 21 Hous. J. Int'l L. 291 (1999) (citing  Arturo Gándara, United States-Mexico Electricity Transfers: Of Alien Electrons and the Migration of Undocumented Environmental Burdens, 16 Energy L.J. 1, (1995); An Industry in Transition: Report of the Committee on Electric Utility Regulation, 17 Energy L.J. 245 (1996); Report of the Committee on Independent Power Production, 1995- 1996, 17 Energy L.J. 503 (1996)).

109.  Magali Matarazzi, Comment, Selecting A Corporate Form: Foreign Direct Investment In Vietnam's Oil And Gas Industry Under The 1995 Land Law, 19 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 364 (1999) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).

110.  David G. Pettinari, Comment, You Can't Always Get What You Want--Will Two Recent State Court Decisions Tarnish The Political Promise Of Electricity Industry Deregulation?, 76 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 501  (1999) (citing Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995); Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995);     Clinton A. Vince & John S. Moot, Federal Preemption Versus State Utility Regulation In A Post-Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1 (1989)).

111.  Beth C. Bryant, Notes & Comments, FERC's Dam Decommissioning Authority Under The Federal Power Act, 74 Wash. L. Rev. 95 (1999) (citing Michael A. Swiger et al., Paying for the Change: Can the FERC Force Dam Decommissioning at Relicensing?, 17 Energy L.J. 163 (1996)). 

112.  Jeffrey L. Harrison, Thomas D. Morgan & Paul R. Verkuil, Regulatory Education And Its Reform, 16 Yale J. on Reg. 145, (1999) (book review) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994)). 

113.  Herbert Hovenkamp, The Takings Clause And Improvident Regulatory Bargains, 108 Yale L.J. 801 (1999) (book review) (citing Daniel F. Spulber, Pricing and the Incentive To Invest in Pipelines After Great Lakes, 15 Energy L.J. 377 (1994)).

114.  29 ELR 10003  The Common-Law Impetus For Advanced Control Of Air Toxics  Environmental Law Reporter  Article  January, 1999     Mark W. Ciaravella, Regulation of Hazardous Air Pollutants Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 15 Energy L.J. 485, 494  (1994).    

115.  Rachel A. Mitchell, Note and Comment   The Electricity Directive Of The European Union: What Can The Member States Learn From The Experiences Of Privatized England And Wales?, 14 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 761 (1999) (citing James Barker, Jr. et al., Regulation of Power Pools and System Operators: An International Comparison, 18 Energy L.J. 216.   

116.  Rodrick J. Coffey, Notes and Comments   Fairness Is In The Eye Of The Beholder: The Conflicting Interpretations Of The Correct Measure Of Damages For Breaches Of Natural Gas Contracts Containing Take-Or-Pay Provisions, 14 BYU J. Pub. L. 151 (1999) (citing Stimpert, Note, Lenape Resources Corporation v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company: Natural Gas Take-or-Pay Contracts Under the Uniform Commercial Code, 18 Energy L.J. 421 (1997)).

117.  Kirsten H. Engel, The Dormant Commerce Clause Threat To Market-Based Environmental Regulation: The Case Of Electricity Deregulation, 26 Ecology L.B. 243 (1999) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994); Robert L. Bradley, The  Origins of Political Electricity: Market Failure or Political Opportunism?, 17 Energy L.J. 59 (1996)).

118.  Charlton H. Bonham, The Condit Dam Removal And Section 18 Of The Federal Power Act: A Coerced Settlemen,t 14 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 97 (1999) (citing Michael A. Swiger et al., Paying for  the Change: Can the FERC Force Dam Decommissioning at Relicensing?, 17 Energy  L.J. 163 (1996)).

119.  Cory L. Taylor, American Rivers, Inc. v. FERC: Conflict Between FERC Authority Under The Federal Power Act And State Authority Under Section 401 Of The Clean Water Act In The Hydroelectric Licensing Process, 14 J. Nat. Resources & Envtl. L. 169  (1998-99) (citing John D. Echeverria, The Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986, 8 Energy L.J. 61 (1987)). 

120.  Barbara A. Vestal, Dueling With Boat Oars, Dragging Through Mooring Lines: Time For More Formal Resolution Of Use Conflicts In States' Coastal Waters?, 4 Ocean & Coastal L.J. 1 (1999) (citing Carolyn Elefant, Ocean Energy Development in the 1990s, 14 Energy L.J. 335 (1993)).

121.  Theodore W. Wern, Note, Judicial Deference To Eeoc Interpretations Of The Civil Rights Act, The Ada, And The Adea: Is The Eeoc A Second Class Agency?, 60 Ohio St. L.J. 1533 (1999) (citing Jerome Nelson, The Chevron Deference Rule and Judicial Review of FERC Orders, 9 Energy L.J. 59 (1988)).

122.  Lawrence J. Spiwak, From International Competitive Carrier To The Wto: A Survey Of The Fcc's International Telecommunications Policy Initiatives 1985-1998, 51 Fed. Comm. L.J. 111 (1998) (citing Lawrence J. Spiwak, Is the Price Squeeze Doctrine Still Viable in Fully-Regulated Energy Markets?, 14 Energy L.J. 75 (1993)).

123.  Jim Rossi, The Irony Of Deregulatory Takings Deregulatory Takings And The Regulatory Contract: The Competitive Transformation Of Network Industries In The United States, 77 Tex. L. Rev. 297 (1998) (book review) (citing Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995); Walter R. Hall II, Securitization and Stranded Cost Recovery, 18 Energy L.J. 363  (1997); Michael A. Swiger et al., Paying for the Change: Can the FERC Force Dam Decommissioning at Relicensing?, 17 Energy L.J. 163 (1996)).

124.  Joseph D. Kearney & Thomas W. Merrill, The Great Transformation Of Regulated Industries Law, 98 Colum. L. Rev. 1323 (1998) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994); Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electric Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995); Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994)).  

125.  Gregory Scott Crespi, Ranking the Environmental Law, Natural Resources Law, and Land Use Planning Journals: A Survey of Expert Opinion, 23 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 273 (1998).

126.  Joseph J. Ward, Comment, Corporate Goliaths In The Costume Of David: The Buestion